the MAF (or facsimile). Upon completion of AWP validation, correct the AWP listing accordingly. The AWP retention goals and thresholds apply to all fixed allowance assets. A daily count of AWP items must be conducted to provide management flexibility. The age of AWP components should be color coded (20, 30, 60, and over 60-day increments). Supply and maintenance personnel must review the AWP when the following situations exist: . Any time the number of AWP components on hand exceeds 15 percent of the average monthly IMA inductions. l The number of aged (more than 60 days) AWP components exceeds 1 percent of the average monthly IMA inductions. There will be situations that will require the use of apiece of a part on a given AWP item that was received for another AWP item. It is sometimes necessary to remove an installed part from an AWP item to fix another AWP item. To ensure replacement of a cannibalized part, a control system is required. The key to controlled cannibalization is documentation. Some occurrences are as follows: . AWP work center review. The work center supervisor or representative determines that, by judicious use of available piece parts accumulated among a group of like AWP items, a given number of those AWP items can be repaired. . CCS initiated review, Outstanding NMCS or PMCS requirements for repairable may require CCS to screen AWP items. The CCS may determine if potential cannibalization is feasible to satisfy the NMCS/PMCS and request the work center to take action. The BCM-4 is an Action Taken code assigned to a repairable item that was not repaired because of lack of parts. Before processing an AWP item as BCM-4, ensure all necessary actions were taken to get the part. Review outstanding requisitions for AWP items on a daily basis. Submit a follow-up if a positive status is not received within 10 days. If a satisfactory status is not received 10 days after the follow-up, submit a request for assistance to the ACC/TYCOM. Refer to NAVSUP P-437 and chapters 3 and 4 of this TRAMAN for additional information about supply assistance requests. There are many variables to consider before you can BCM an item. They are listed as follows: Operational requirement. The component maybe required to meet a specific operational tasking. Readiness. Mission capable (MC); full mission capable (FMC). IMA production capacity. Supply system availability of repair parts versus availability of WRA or SRA. Financial impact, considering the cost of repair parts vice net cost of WRA or SRA. To process the item for BCM-4, reinduct the item into the work center. The work center will reinstall the piece parts and perform preservation on the item. Ensure that the item is complete (no missing parts) before shipping it to the designated ATAC hub. Request for approval to retrograde assets will include the following information: Nomenclature NSN Part number Quantity Past 90-day removal rate Normal median TAT in IMA Tentative BCM code of defective item Narrative of problem precluding local repair Include the 30-day assist message previously submitted to the ACC/TYCOM as reference. Other assets held in AWP may be BCM without prior ACC/TYCOM approval when the retention limitations are reached. In a NALCOMIS activity, AWP personnel use several conversation codes to perform AWP functions. Some of these conversation codes are as follows: Conversation code N203 provides a cross-reference of part number to a CAGE and stock number. Conversation code N216 displays the Failed/Required Material Data of the MAF Control Number (MCN). Conversation code N644 is used to receive a component into the AWP location. The Job Status code must be “WT” to process component into AWP location. Conversation code N646 is used to release AWP components back to the repair cycle. The Job Status 9-18